Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the boldgrid-inspirations domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/raxter5/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the kaliforms domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/raxter5/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/raxter5/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home/raxter5/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Specialized Litigation – Duncombe Law, P.A. https://raxterlaw.com Empowering your legal decision-making with personal, relaxed, informative, and educated legal services Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:56:12 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 https://raxterlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/cropped-cropped-cropped-raxter11newpng-32x32.png Specialized Litigation – Duncombe Law, P.A. https://raxterlaw.com 32 32 What is Revenge Porn? California Penal Code 647(j)(4) https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1491 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1491#respond Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:32:52 +0000 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1491

The Legal Battle Against Revenge Porn in California. Protecting Dignity and Privacy - California Civil Code 1708.85 explained

In an era where technology has revolutionized communication and social interaction, it’s essential to recognize the dark side of these advancements. One such issue that has garnered significant attention in recent years is revenge porn, a despicable act that can have devastating consequences for its victims. In California lawmakers at the forefront of the fight against revenge porn, implementing stringent laws to protect individuals from this digital exploitation.

Revenge porn refers to the distribution of sexually explicit images or videos of individuals without their consent, typically by a former partner seeking to humiliate or exact revenge. This malicious act can have profound emotional, psychological, and even professional repercussions for the victim, leading to feelings of shame, embarrassment, and violation of privacy.

Recognizing the urgency of addressing this issue, California took proactive measures to combat revenge porn. In 2013, the state enacted legislation specifically targeting this harmful behavior. The California Penal Code 647(j)(4) criminalizes the distribution of intimate images without the subject’s consent, making it a misdemeanor punishable by fines and imprisonment.

Moreover, California’s revenge porn laws go beyond criminal penalties to provide civil remedies for victims. California Civil Code 1708.85 allows individuals to seek damages in civil court for the unauthorized distribution of intimate images, providing victims with a legal avenue to pursue justice and compensation for the harm inflicted upon them.

We need to work together towards a safer and more respectful online environment for all.

If you’ve been a victim of the non-consensual distribution of intimate images, don’t hesitate to reach out to the attorneys at Raxter Law to explore your legal options. Our firm serves clients across the state of California and is dedicated to advocating for your rights and seeking justice on your behalf.

]]>
https://raxterlaw.com/?feed=rss2&p=1491 0
Does a Bar owe a duty to protect you from injury after you leave? https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1412 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1412#respond Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:42:24 +0000 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1412

Analyzing Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc. (2023) 2023 Cal App LEXIS 756

Legal cases often serve as critical touchpoints in our ever-evolving legal system, shaping the way we interpret and apply the law. One such recent case that has captured our attention is Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc., a legal battle that reached its conclusion in 2023 and is reported as 2023 Cal App LEXIS 756. This case provides valuable insights into premises liability, the duty owed by businesses to their patrons, and the legal implications of unforeseen events.

The Case in a Nutshell

Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc. centers around a tragic incident involving the plaintiff, Nicholas, and his friends, who were patrons at the defendant’s bar. The fateful night in question, a fight erupted between Nicholas and several other patrons, leading to bar security intervening and escorting both groups outside.

While an altercation may have briefly reignited outside, it was promptly halted by security, and both parties went their separate ways. The police were not called at this point.

However, a fatal confrontation occurred later when Nicholas and his friends crossed paths with their earlier assailants from the bar. In this subsequent encounter, a beer bottle was thrown, striking Nicholas’s friend in the face. An altercation ensued, resulting in the tragic death of Nicholas.

Nicholas’s parents pursued a wrongful death lawsuit against the defendants, arguing that they were responsible for Nicholas’s death. The defendants, in response, sought summary judgment, contending that their duty to Nicholas had terminated when he left the bar peacefully with his friends and when the assailants departed. According to the defendants, their duty did not extend to the later fight that occurred away from their premises.

The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants, finding that they owed no duty to Nicholas because the fatal altercation had transpired outside the bar. Nicholas’s parents subsequently appealed.

The Court of Appeal’s Decision

On appeal, the Court of Appeal for the Fourth District considered a vital aspect: the duty owed by the bar to its patrons. This duty arises from the special relationship between a business and its customers, including their safety and well-being.

To assess this duty, the Court applied the factors outlined in Rowland v. Christian, a landmark California Supreme Court case. These factors include the foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff, the certainty of the plaintiff’s injury, the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury, moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the burden on the defendant, and the consequences to the community regarding liability for breaches, as well as the availability, cost, and prevalence of insurance.

In its analysis, the Court recognized that the harm suffered by Nicholas was arguably foreseeable by the defendants. They were aware of the earlier attack within the bar, and it was foreseeable that further conflicts and injuries might occur later if Nicholas encountered the assailants again.

The Court also considered the certainty of injury, as Nicholas had tragically lost his life. However, the third factor, which assesses the closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury, weighed against finding a duty. The Court noted that the logic of the causal connection between the defendants’ conduct and Nicholas’s death was tenuous, given the physical distance and the passage of time.

Moreover, the Court found that the moral blameworthiness of the defendants’ conduct did not support the imposition of a duty. While the defendants had not adhered to their safety plan, which recommended calling the police, the lack of such a call when the parties had separated and left peaceably did not typically warrant moral blame.

The policy of preventing future harm, the fifth factor, offered weak support for finding a duty. While calling the police after bar altercations might marginally reduce the frequency and severity of injuries from subsequent altercations, it would not eliminate them entirely.

The sixth factor, concerning the burden on the defendant and the consequences to the community, weighed heavily against imposing a duty. Requiring bars to call the police after every altercation, even those that later lead to off-premises conflicts, would strain law enforcement resources and potentially increase insurance costs.

The seventh and final factor, regarding the availability, cost, and prevalence of insurance, weakly supported finding a duty. While bars are already insured against many of the risks associated with their operations, imposing a broader duty would expand their potential liability and potentially raise insurance costs.

Ultimately, the Court upheld the trial court’s decision, concluding that the defendants did not owe a duty to Nicholas after he left the bar peacefully with his friends, and thus, the duty to exercise care ended.

Legal Ramifications

Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc. is a sobering reminder of the complex nature of premises liability and the duty that businesses owe to their patrons. The case underscores that a business’s duty to its patrons extends only to protecting them from imminent or ongoing criminal conduct. When patrons safely and peaceably leave the premises, as Nicholas did, the bar’s special relationship with them ends, and its duty terminates.

The outcome of this case reflects the delicate balance that courts must strike between protecting individual rights and preventing overburdening businesses, law enforcement, and the community at large.

Take action today! If you have been injured in a bar, give us a call. Legal cases like Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc. remind us that the law is ever-evolving and complex. If you’re facing a legal issue or have questions about its potential impact on your situation, don’t hesitate to reach out to legal experts for guidance. You can reach us at (951) 226-5294 or office@raxterlaw.com 

]]>
https://raxterlaw.com/?feed=rss2&p=1412 0
Seeking Justice: The Role of a Wrongful Death Lawyer https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1259 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1259#respond Mon, 18 Sep 2023 23:37:20 +0000 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=1259
Seeking Justice: The Role of a Wrongful Death Lawyer

Losing a loved one is one of life’s most painful experiences, and when that loss is due to someone else’s negligence or misconduct, the grief can be compounded by anger and frustration. In such tragic circumstances, it’s essential to understand your rights and options. This blog post explores the crucial role of a wrongful death lawyer, shedding light on how they can help grieving families seek justice and find closure.

Understanding Wrongful Death

Types of Wrongful Death Claims

1. Medical Malpractice:

Medical malpractice wrongful death claims arise when a healthcare provider’s negligence, substandard care, or misdiagnosis leads to a patient’s death. This can include cases involving surgical errors, medication mistakes, or failure to diagnose a life-threatening condition.

2. Car Accidents:

Car accidents are a leading cause of wrongful death claims. If a reckless or negligent driver causes a fatal collision, the surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim to seek compensation for their loss.

3. Workplace Accidents:

Fatal workplace accidents can occur due to unsafe conditions, inadequate training, or employer negligence. In such cases, the family of the deceased may be eligible for wrongful death benefits, including compensation for lost income and funeral expenses.

4. Product Liability:

Wrongful death claims related to product liability involve defective products that lead to fatal accidents. This could range from faulty auto parts to unsafe consumer goods. Manufacturers, distributors, and sellers may be held accountable.

5. Criminal Acts:

When a person’s death results from a criminal act, such as homicide or assault, the family can pursue a wrongful death claim alongside criminal charges. This can provide compensation and a sense of justice for the loss.

6. Nursing Home Abuse:

In cases where elder abuse or neglect in a nursing home facility results in the death of a resident, the family can file a wrongful death claim against the facility for failing to provide proper care.

7. Construction Accidents:

Fatal construction accidents may occur due to unsafe worksites, inadequate safety measures, or employer negligence. Surviving family members can seek compensation through a wrongful death claim.

8. Dangerous Premises:

Property owners have a duty to maintain safe premises. If a fatal accident occurs due to hazardous conditions or inadequate security on someone else’s property, a wrongful death claim can be pursued.

The Role of a Wrongful Death Lawyer

1. Legal Expertise:

Wrongful death cases involve complex legal processes, rules, and regulations. A wrongful death lawyer is well-versed in navigating this intricate web of laws and regulations. They will help you understand your rights and guide you through the legal proceedings.

2. Gathering Evidence:

To prove liability in a wrongful death case, substantial evidence is required. Lawyers work diligently to collect evidence such as witness statements, expert testimonies, accident reconstructions, and medical records to build a compelling case.

3. Establishing Negligence:

Proving that the death occurred due to someone else’s negligence is a key element of a wrongful death claim. Lawyers use their legal expertise to establish fault and liability. This is usually the most difficult part of the case. 

4. Compensation:

Wrongful death lawyers advocate for compensation on behalf of the deceased’s family. This may include monetary damages for medical expenses, funeral costs, lost income, and emotional suffering.

5. Negotiation and Litigation:

In many cases, wrongful death claims are settled through negotiation. Your lawyer will engage in negotiations with the responsible party’s insurance company to reach a fair settlement. If negotiations fail, they will prepare for litigation and represent your interests in court.

6. Probate / Estate Matters:

A probate lawyer is crucial in wrongful death cases to handle legal complexities, protect your interests, and ensure fair distribution of assets, all while resolving disputes and managing debts and taxes effectively.

6. Emotional Support:

Dealing with a wrongful death case is emotionally taxing. A compassionate lawyer can provide not just legal guidance but some emotional support during this difficult time. Most experienced lawyers have great referrals to support groups, therapists, and other mental health professionals. It’s okay to feel the way you do and to grieve in your own time. 

Conclusion

A wrongful death lawyer is more than just a legal representative; they are advocates for justice and closure in the face of tragedy. If you’ve lost a loved one due to someone else’s negligence or misconduct, give the attorneys at RAXTER LAW, P.A. a call as we can help you navigate the legal process and work to ensure that those responsible are held accountable. While we can imagine the pain you are suffering or can’t bring your loved one back, we will work tirelessly to assist you in finding some sense of justice and financial relief during a challenging time.

Call us at (951) 226-5294 or email us as office@raxterlaw.com 


]]>
https://raxterlaw.com/?feed=rss2&p=1259 0
California’s Code of Civil Procedure §340.16: Empowering Survivors of Sexual Assault https://raxterlaw.com/?p=894 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=894#respond Fri, 04 Aug 2023 18:48:18 +0000 https://raxterlaw.com/?p=894

In the fight against sexual assault, the legal landscape has undergone significant changes over the years. One crucial development that has provided survivors with renewed hope and expanded opportunities for justice is California’s Code of Civil Procedure §340.16. This groundbreaking statute, which came into effect on January 1, 2023, has been instrumental in extending the time frame for survivors to seek civil remedies for damages stemming from sexual assault. In this blog post, we delve into the essence and impact of §340.16 and its role in empowering survivors to pursue accountability and healing.

Understanding Code of Civil Procedure §340.16:

§340.16 is a transformative piece of legislation that has reshaped the landscape of sexual assault litigation in California. Prior to its enactment, statutes of limitations often presented significant barriers for survivors seeking legal redress for damages resulting from sexual assault incidents that occurred years ago. Such limitations imposed rigid time restrictions, making it challenging for survivors to bring forth civil claims and seek justice.

However, with the introduction of §340.16, survivors have been granted an extended window of opportunity to seek civil remedies for damages suffered as a result of sexual assault. This statute effectively revives certain claims related to sexual assault that would otherwise have been barred by statutes of limitations.

The Impact on Survivors:

For survivors of sexual assault, the passage of §340.16 has been a game-changer. Many individuals who previously felt silenced or dismissed due to the passage of time now have a renewed sense of empowerment. This statute recognizes the complexities of trauma and the profound impact sexual assault can have on survivors’ lives, often leading to delayed reporting or seeking legal recourse.

With the extended time frame, survivors can now pursue civil claims, seeking damages from those responsible for the harm they endured. §340.16 has provided survivors with a vital opportunity to hold perpetrators accountable, seek compensation for their suffering, and pave the way for healing and closure.

Legal Implications:

The enactment of §340.16 has had far-reaching implications in the legal community. Attorneys and legal practitioners now approach sexual assault cases with a heightened awareness of the statute’s impact on the survivor’s ability to seek justice. The statute has fostered a more inclusive legal environment, acknowledging that survivors’ paths to healing may not conform to rigid timelines.

However, it is essential to recognize that §340.16 applies specifically to civil actions for damages related to sexual assault. Criminal statutes of limitations, which govern the prosecution of sexual assault cases, remain separate and distinct.

Conclusion:

California’s Code of Civil Procedure §340.16 has ushered in a new era of empowerment and justice for survivors of sexual assault. By extending the time frame for pursuing civil remedies, this statute has shattered barriers that previously hindered survivors from seeking accountability and compensation for the harm they endured.

 

As we move forward, it is vital for survivors, legal advocates, and the broader community to understand the significance of §340.16 and the critical role it plays in creating a more just and compassionate legal system.

The Attorneys and Advocates at RAXTER LAW, P.A. understand that reaching out for help after experiencing sexual assault can be incredibly challenging. Your well-being and healing are our top priorities, and we are here to support you every step of the way. If you’ve been through a traumatic experience, we want you to know that you are not alone.

Calling a lawyer who has experience in sexual assault cases can be a crucial step in reclaiming your power and seeking justice. Here’s why:

Confidentiality and Empathy: Our team of compassionate attorneys creates a safe and supportive space for you to share your story. We respect your privacy and understand the sensitivity of your situation.

Guidance through the Legal Process: Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when dealing with a traumatic event. We are well-versed in sexual assault laws and will guide you through every legal aspect of your case, ensuring you understand your rights and options.

Advocating for Your Rights: Our mission is to fight for your rights and pursue the justice you deserve. We are relentless in holding perpetrators accountable for their actions and seeking compensation for the damages you’ve endured.

Extending the Statute of Limitations: In California, Code of Civil Procedure §340.16 has expanded the time frame for seeking civil remedies related to sexual assault. Even if the incident occurred years ago, you may still have a path to seek justice.

Holistic Support: Beyond legal representation, we work closely with support networks, therapists, and counselors to provide comprehensive care for your emotional and mental well-being.

A Voice for Change: By coming forward, you contribute to breaking the cycle of silence and stigma surrounding sexual assault. Your bravery can inspire others to speak up, creating a safer and more compassionate society.

Your story matters, and we are here to listen, support, and fight alongside you. We believe in the power of collective action to create a future free from sexual violence.

Please don’t hesitate to call us for a confidential consultation. Together, let’s embark on a journey towards healing, justice, and reclaiming your strength.

 

Feel free to contact us at (951) 226-5294. There is no need to tell the receptionist your story if you don’t want. You can just say “I need an advocate” and we will know that you are ready to seek justice. 

]]>
https://raxterlaw.com/?feed=rss2&p=894 0